![]() Imo a very closely related feature of Tags colud be the temporal inheritance of parent Tags for search results. Thanks for continuing to expand my horizons and this product. Or maybe there is way of filtering the tags? - if there is, please let me know! Or maybe I’m thinking about this all wrong, and I should just make everything a #, including people? Would love to hear your thoughts on this. ![]() The way its currently implemented seems a bit chaotic to my eye. That way I can quickly look through my address book for someone. What you show, of course, is all the tags alphabetically regardless of # or wondering if it would be possible to have, for us simpler folk, a bifurcated list option with the and #'s grouped. But it also seems a bit looser.įor example what I was expecting when I clicked on the “tag” list view was to see all the followed by all the #verb/nouns. So one entry might be “ #call I click on #call I can see everyone I should call, including Amanda.Īnd right before I speak to amanda I click and boom, I get the full history of when I spoke to Amanda in the simple calendar function I run in the outliner - because every time we’ve spoken in the past, I’ve made a brief note and tagged it it seems you are using and # in a more expansive sophisticated way. So in the past (yeah yeah I’m all Stockholm syndromed from WF) I’ve used for people. Hey while we’re here, can I bend your ear about something else - cuz this brings up another point as to how you are using these different hashtag types. Super cool, really appreciate the thoughtful kind answer. We originally got this idea from TaskPaper, after a user suggested it. Of course, this is just my current thoughts, could change anytime in the future. There could be workarounds, just like how people work around dates in WorkFlowy, but it’s different than being supported natively, just like it would take a crazy WorkFlowy extension to sync those custom dates to Google Calendar. I know you can workaround with “!!!”, but it harder to work around some other cases, like tracking time with or assign tasks with vs With plain tags, it can be hard to search for items that are assigned to amanda without seeing stuff that are assigned by amanda, unless you add specialized tags for both ( #assigned_by_amanda and #assigned_to_amanda). It’s super flexible for quantitative data.You can just pretend it doesn’t exist and it won’t affect you one bit (at least we hope we can make it so). It does not bother people who don’t use it, at all, unlike the four menus that you never use in Photoshop.Two reasons why I think this is worth it: I like the notebook a little bit better, because then I can easily go back through my list of tasks from previous days.I’m all for functionality, and if it helps people thats fantastic, but I wonder if its a really big hammer for this nut? (FWIW, I either use index cards, or a small spiral-bound notebook. I find that I stay much more focused that way. Maybe I'm too old-school, but I like tracking my tasks with pen and paper, and that feeling of crossing them off. It's several days after my TaskPaper trial expired, and despite the fact that I really like the application, I don't miss it very much. I guess I'll see if I'm still using it 10 days from now. ![]() Wow, it's hard to say that it isn't worth $20. The approach is very creative - so kudos for that - but I think I can re-create this product in just a few days, so I'll have a hard time paying $18.95 for it. One last criticism: I think the price is too high for what this product currently does. After a restart I was able to create a new tab, but it copied all my existing tasks to the new tab. Fortunately my data file was not screwed up. One criticism: the first time I tried to create a new tab the application crashed. Since I've managed to keep using TaskPaper for four days now, I may try these soon. This seems to help it integrate with other applications, like Vim, TextMate, and Ta-Da List. ![]() There is a shortcut for deleting a task (), so hopefully a "done" shortcut will be available soon.Īs mentioned, TaskPaper takes an interesting approach in saving your data in a plain text file with custom tags. Second, I'd sure like to be able to hit a simple keystroke to say "I'm done with this task", and I don't think that exists. First, there's very little help available. The current release of TaskPaper is 1.0, and that tells in a few areas. Possibly the best features about TaskPaper is that it looks like the normal paper lists I normally make, and also lets you cross completed tasks off the list, giving you that good old feeling of accomplishment. TaskPaper takes an interesting approach of letting you work on a plain-text file with custom tags. As I mentioned in a review of the Easy Task Manager for Mac OS X, I've come to prefer an application named TaskPaper. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |